|
images of Rihanna in the media were her onstage outfits, which were all leather straps, metal studs, fishnets and fierce heels: female sexuality as visual performance."
Iron Maiden and Motley Crüe must be turning in their proverbial graves at the media's roundtable of confections by quota and allocation. Yesterday it was the boys' bands that held metals studs and naked ass peeking through leather pants as male visual performance, today it is the girls at the same stage with the same toys and prop sets.
The UK Guardian wraps up its 2012 piece "When asked about the S&M video … in British Vogue … she [Rihanna] said: 'that's not me. That's a part I play ....' Her fans, however, ardently want to believe that she is 'just being herself' - so that, for the most part, is the message they are given."
It's possible there is an unspoken all-points bulletin issued by the Washington DC-based National Press Club to reporters and editors; when covering Rihanna, guys and gals do bring up the issue of manufactured personna, stage image versus the "real deal".
Is it the music divas that are sounding like a chorus line or is it the press that's lined up like a group of choir boys singing in unison?
Is there anything really special to Ri? Not if you stop and analyze the details and components, it all seemed to have been tried before but perhaps the right crew of talented contributors coalesced around an equally talented and extremely sexy performer and behold, the marketing and media machine was amply stocked and available when her turn came up to walk down the runway.
Her most recent album, Unapologetic, of 2012 resulted in another sizzle interview with GQ Magazine. Slave to fame?!!! Of course not, she is a slave to love, loving her work: "If I didn't like what I was doing, then I would say I was committing slavery. "
|